Wednesday, May 25 2022

Screw Curt Schilling and other thoughts on my HOF ballot originally appeared on NBC Sports Chicago

Screw Curt Schilling.

He wanted to be removed from the Hall of Fame ballot when he didn’t get in last year? I voted for him anyway.

That’ll teach him.

Not that it made a difference. His pompous request to the National Baseball Hall of Fame last year appears to have cost him even more votes this time around, and he fell short again, along with Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Sammy Sosa, all four in their final years on the writers’ ballot.

Schilling was the only one from that group who got a vote on my ballot. The others did not for reasons made public repeatedly, including in a column on this site almost two years ago.

What about the “character” clause in the voting that some colleagues appear to have used to withhold their votes because of Schilling’s post-baseball use of his celebrity to amplify lunatic-fringe (my words) views such as QAnon conspiracy theories and support for the Jan. 6 insurrectionists?

How does considering “character” and “integrity” — as the Hall of Fame stipulates — reconcile against those views or that ugly “So much awesome here” tweet in 2016 he shared with a picture of someone wearing a shirt that said, “Rope. Tree. Journalist. Some assembly required”?

Simple. It’s not the good-guy Hall of Fame for dudes I like or agree with. Or It’s not the right-side-of-history Hall of Fame.

It’s not the only-if-you-believe-journalists-shouldn’t-be-hanged Hall of Fame.

It’s the baseball Hall of Fame.

And taking the Hall’s cryptic “integrity” and “character” guideline outside of that context — outside of the way someone played the game, the conduct on the field/in the clubhouse and how conduct off the field during a career reflected on the team and sport — risks a miscarriage of “integrity” of the ballot.

According to accounts from former teammates, Schilling wasn’t a favorite of everybody in the clubhouse. But even within that, it was more about eye rolls than anger or harm done. And the guy competed, won championships, did more to help his teams — especially in the biggest games — than most while compiling Hall-worthy numbers. And this: He was one of the few (along with Frank Thomas) to voluntarily speak out loudly to Congress against performance-enhancing drugs and to advocate for stricter measures for ridding the game of drug cheats.

Hell, the far more difficult decision involved Omar Vizquel, one of the best shortstops I’ve seen play in 25 years as a beat writer (four teams, both leagues) — and half of what’s easily the best middle infield I saw play (with Robbie Alomar in Cleveland).

He got my vote before revelations of domestic abuse arose 13 months ago, along with an MLB investigation and firing over the summer by the White Sox over allegations of sexual harassment of a batboy while managing in the minors.

I drew a very reluctant line at what he did during his playing career within the game and the “character” he at least seemed to embody then. Few colleagues seemed to agree, with Vizquel’s support plummeting by more than half.

Only two more players made my ballot, including Torii Hunter, a player I covered much of the first half of his career — a player unlikely to be elected but the kind of total-package player and influencer I would choose among the first two or three of anyone I’ve covered to build a winning team around.

The other is David Ortiz, whose link to the PED survey testing in 2003 was a big cause for hesitation.

He has denied that he took banned substances since a list of 104 players with positive tests was leaked in 2009, said he was “surprised” when the players’ union told him the report was true but also said he didn’t know what he tested positive for.

“You don’t know what anybody tested positive for,” he said Tuesday when asked about the list from 2003. “Then we started being drug tested [with public disclosure of positives], and I never failed a test. What does that tell you?”

Unlike Bonds, Clemens and Sosa, most of Ortiz’s career — and all 10 of his All-Star seasons and three championships — came after 2003, when testing was stepped up and penalties applied.

That created at least some reasonable doubt.

And given his enormous impact on the Red Sox franchise, baseball’s postseason history and every clubhouse he entered, that was enough to sway the vote in his favor.

My ballot:

Click here to subscribe to the Cubs Talk Podcast for free.

Download

Download MyTeams Today!

Source: Yahoo Sports

Previous

Justin Braun with a Goal vs. New York Islanders

Next

Commentary: Barry Bonds didn't make the Hall of Fame. Get over it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Pro Sports Media

Trending Now

Yankees’ Nestor Cortes explains temporarily deleting Twitter account: ‘I’ve grown up… I’m trying to clean that up’

Nestor Cortes Jr. pitches in white pinstripes Nestor Cortes deleted his Twitter account on Monday after inappropriate tweets of his were unearthed in the previous 24 hours. Cortes, whose 1.35 ERA is the second-lowest in baseball, had a series of questionable tweets from 2012-15 which were brought to light during his eight scoreless innings on […]

Read More

Reported pessimism Khris Middleton will return in Game 7 Sunday

The Milwaukee Bucks miss Khris Middleton. Their offense has struggled in the halfcourt against the Celtics, averaging 84.4 points per 100 possessions on their first shot in the halfcourt, the worst of any team in the second round of the playoffs and 10 points per 100 below their regular season average. Part of that is […]

Read More

Cardinals vs. Pirates live on Peacock: How to watch, stream, start time, TV channel for MLB Sunday Leadoff game

It’s the St. Louis Cardinals vs the Pittsburgh Pirates live from PNC Park at 11:30 AM this Sunday on Peacock. 18 MLB games will be featured on the streaming service this season. Live coverage begins at 11:00 a.m ET. See below for additional information on how to watch the game. RELATED: MLB schedule 2022: Every […]

Read More