But his preference? Returning to the Lakers as a player.
he would have played for a non-guaranteed contract
It appears they didn’t want him as a player because they felt that, with their aging team, they need youthful depth. They apparently never discussed the possibility that he would retire and become a coach.
“Obviously LeBron and A.D. wanted me back,” said Dudley. “But we just couldn’t convince them.”
“I talked to Rob and Kurt, I thanked them, but I told them, you’re valuing youth more than a locker room presence guy,” Dudley said. “I said, ‘I respect you for doing that, but I think you’re wrong,’”
It’s somewhat surprising the Lakers wouldn’t bring Dudley to training camp on an unguaranteed contract. They could have still waived him if they wanted to use their roster spots differently but at least kept their options open.
Perhaps they feared the politics of waiving Dudley once he gathered with other players, though.
Congrats to my guy if this true, which is probably is! But man!! [F***]
This sounds similar to LeBron’s reaction to the Cavaliers not re-signing Kendrick Perkins.
Dudley would have provided value as a veteran mentor. His professionalism and and basketball intelligence are exemplary.
But the 36-year-old struggled to contribute on the court at this stage of his career. Los Angeles sapped its depth in trading for Westbrook. Many of the reinforcements are older, furthering the need for playable depth.
Young players also bring a a contagious energy. That can definitely help an old team like the Lakers through a long season
We’ll see what the Lakers do with their remaining roster spots. Dudley would have provided value. But other players could provide more.
More on the Lakers
Oscar Robertson: With triple-double average, Russell Westbrook should’ve… NBA win total over/under odds for next season: Nets, Bucks, Lakers top list Could Paul Millsap sit out start of season until right team, role presents…
Source: Yahoo Sports